U.S. LAW =FALSE DOUBLE-SPEAK
NOAHIDE LAW REGARDING LAW
Law 7. Mankind is commanded to establish courts of justice and a just social order to enforce the first six laws and enact any other useful laws or customs.
THE U.S. HAS VIOLATED THE SEVENTH NOAHIDE LAW
Students are given government classes every year until they graduate from high school. They then say the students are presumed to know about their government. Students are never given any law classes but then all the legal profession say that you are presumed to know the law. There is no basis for this presumption. In fact they don’t want you to know the law. The legal profession believe that they own the law.
EXAMPLE OF U.S. LAW
No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts….
ARTICLE I, SECTION 10, CLAUSE 1
– U.S.A. Constitution
“Gold possession declared illegal” – against the constitution of the U.S.A.
President Roosevelt Declared a National Emergency, declared gold possession by American Citizens as illegal in the Trading with Enemies Act on April 5, 1933. Executive Order 6102
Most Americans are unaware of this, but in the 1930s, by way of Executive Order 6102, President Franklyn D. Roosevelt actually outlawed gold ownership. The Order forbade “…the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States.”
Once the Order had been enacted, owning gold became a federal crime, punishable by ten years in federal prison and a $10,000 fine; no individual, partnership, association, organization, or corporation could possess monetary gold, in any form, for any reason. The Order commanded all U.S. citizens to, at once, relinquish the gold they rightfully owned to the U.S. government.
Citizens were then given paper dollars for their gold, at a price of $20.67 per ounce. When all gold was collected, FDR immediately devalued the dollar by reissuing the price of gold at $35 an ounce. In other words, U.S. residents that turned in their gold lost almost 50% of that savings value overnight!
U.S. LAW FALSE=DOUBLE-SPEAK
|
Justice |
JUST – US |
||
| Free inhabitants are under God’s commandments, one’s conscience, and the English Common Law (Jury)Citizens within the Northwest territory are under the written legislated laws created by Congress which is adjudicated via the Judicial Branch of government established by “Article III” of the Constitution | So-called Judicial system and Legislature are under the President Most courts today are Article I or Article II courts. | ||
| Separate from Executive and Legislative branches of government “serving the People” under Constitutional mandates. | The so-called Judicial is not separate although it may appear that way.Most so-called courts today are listed in Dun & Bradstreet as a private company or corporation, operating as a business for profit. | ||
| judicial venue | federal (feudal) venue | ||
| Ministerial court system To serve the people–“Servant” | Administrative court system Responsible to the administration –“Support” | ||
| General Law Common Law “The nature of law is to maintain justice.” –Bastiat 1848 | Private, internal law “…the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.” “Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it.” –Bastiat 1848 | ||
Common Law (Law not written)Common Law is based on custom and usage and includes the Magna Carta and The great Charter of the ForestCommon Law has two basic requirements:
The 7th Amendment guarantees a trial by jury according to the rules of the common law when the value in controversy exceeds Twenty dollars [in silver specie; not FRN’s] “When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” – Thomas Jefferson |
Civil Law based on the Roman Civil LawCovers a vast number of volumes of text that even attorneys can’t absorb or comprehend such as:
There are now over 60 million of these so-called laws on the books. Keep in mind “ignorance of the law is no excuse” Everyone must be guilty of something. The more so-called laws, the more revenue generated. “The more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws.” –Cornelius Tacitus (c. 55-117 A.D.) “The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.” –Bastiat law (1936-) Prior to bankruptcy of 1933 “Public Law” Now the so-called courts administer “Public Policy” through the “Uniform Commercial Code” (instituted in 1967)
|
||
| Constitution Supreme Law of the land restricting a central government, appointed and elected officials, and their staff.The “organic” Constitution and its amendments are created by the states united to institute, restrict, and restrain a limited central government and to protect the people from such central government from infringing on the peoples God-given rights. | No stare decisisMeans no precedent binds any court, because they have no law standard of absolute right and wrong by which to measure a ruling—what is legal today may not be legal tomorrow. So-called “court decisions” are administrative opinions only and are basically decided on the basis of “What is best for the corporate government.” Most so-called laws today don’t protect you against them, but protects them against you. | ||
| Grand Jury composed of 25 people who are Sovereigns–Magna Carta, Article 61 | so-called Grand Jury composed of 24 US citizens | ||
| Judicial Courts with real Judicial Officers and real Juries who can judge the law as well as the facts Jury decisions cannot be reversed by the judge | The so-called courts are actually Corporate Arbitration Boards Consisting of an Arbitrator (so-called “Judge”) and sometimes a panel of corporate employees (so-called “Juries”) Panel decisions (recommendation) can be reversed by the Arbitrator | ||
| Judges (No black robes)The judicial officer is actually a coordinator who sits in on behalf of the people, for the good of the people, who swears by full oath of office to abide by and uphold the Constitution, and is there to give presenters and counselors equal opportunity to present their case, with fairness and un bias to all, whether it is pertaining to a controversy or one suspected of a crime or injustice, to produce and provide an impartial and fair trial or suite in Law by bringing forth the facts and the law to bejudged by the people who are peers.The people are the ultimate “judges” of both the law and the facts. | The so-called judge, a corporate “black-robe”referee, an actor (acting judge), on a fictitious stage, sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag, becomes the “captain” or “master” of that ship or enclave and has absolute power to make the rules at his whim as he goes; all the while talking to or about the fictitious PERSON.The so-called judge will sometimes not allow all of the facts to be heard or the so-called law examined because of his bias or is following orders of the corporate so-called government who may even want to have the case sealedfrom the public. If one does not conform to the judge’s wishes, the judge, without proper cause, will send the non-conformist to a psychiatric ward for evaluation (intimidation) and sometimes left there to be drugged and not released until one is willing to conform to the judge’s bias. This has happened many times in the latter years and has been personally witnessed by Myself concerning friends. “…the judiciary has usurped the law for its own purposes and replaced constitutional guarantees with a system in which judges rule by decree.”–www.tulanelink.com | ||
| Common Law Court is a “Court of Record” that proceeds according to Common Law, keeps a record of the proceedings, has power to fine or imprison, and the tribunal is independent of the magistrate. (May also have a seal) | These so-called courts are not “in law” but are simply acting on behalf of a corporate business enforcing it’s contracts under the disguise of Equity Courts, Superior courts, Federal courts, District courts, Municipal Courts–Merchant Law, Military Law, Marshall Law, Summary Court Martial proceedings, and administrative ad hocktribunals (similar to Admiralty/Maritime) and appear to be governed by “The Manual of Courts Martial” (under Acts of War) and the “War Powers Act of 1933.” | ||
| Lawful or UnlawfulBased on God’s law, the common law, and any law that any prudent man will abide by under normal circumstances without giving up one’s rights or infringing upon another’s rights. | Legal or IllegalAll legal actions are pursued under the “color of law”Color of law means “appears to be” law, but is not “Because of what appears to be lawful commands on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance.” –United States Supreme Court US. v. Minker , 350 US 179 at 187 (1956) | ||
| Trial by Jury of one’s peers, whether Civil or Criminal.The people have the ultimate say in any matter. | Provides “hearings” whenever possible for total control unless one insists on having a jury trial. “Jury Trial” (recommendation) is not the same as “Trial by jury of one’s peers.”So-called judges have been known to overturn jury trial recommendations. Hearings are not mentioned in the constitutions. | ||
| Suit | Action | ||
| Crime (a noun) Injury to a man, woman, or child; or damaged their property Must be an injured party Must show actual harm or damage | Criminal offence “criminal” is an adjective; not a noun An offence is not a crime but is a violation of a policy Enforcement of policies The name “Police” came from “policies” | ||
| Accusor | Plaintiff Informant Complainant | ||
| Accused No defense necessary unless evidence and witnesses is overwhelming. | Defendant Needs to defend against guilt assumption. | ||
| Accusation“Claim” other terms used: “true bill,” “libel”“In-jury” Latin for infringement-of rights | “Charge” Charged with…(a negative) (payment or retribution is the positive) “an assertion that someone is guilty of a fault or offence” “(criminal law) a pleading describing some wrong or offense”When asked, “Do you understand the charges…?”, actually means “Do you stand under the charges…?” | ||
| “Writ” Form of written command in the name of one in authority such as a Sovereign, such as a member of “We the people”Some examples are as follows: Writ of Habeas corpus, “An order to bring forth the body”; usually from jail or prison. Writ of Mandamus “Commanding an official to perform a ministerial act.” “Used only when all other judicial remedies fail” Writ of Prohibition “An order prohibiting an act” Writ of Certiorari “An order demanding the record”Although most definitions today only mentions that writs can be issued by a judge or are a court order, in reality, almost anyone, except “US citizens” (subjects or slaves), can issue such writs. Writs are tools of the common law. | “Motion” “A formal application to a court (so-called judge) for its (his or her) order, ruling, judgement or decree.” –Ballentines Law DictionaryA motion must be supported by an affidavit but the affidavit cannot be read during the hearing. —lectlaw.com“hearings are conducted as oral arguments in support of motions,” —Wikipedia | ||
| Emit writs | Submit documents | ||
| Writ of Error | Appeal | ||
| “Present” Present as ones self. | “Represent” derived from re-present. To present as someone else. To re-present as the “Ens Legis” a.k.a. STRAWMAN name If you are represented, you are a ward of the court and are incompetent or a juvenile. | ||
| “Venue” (A place) “the county from which the jury are to come, who are to try the issue” –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary | “Re-venue” Now often seen as “revenue” which refers to monies collected by changing ones venue to a corporate government venue. | ||
| “in-law” (i.e. “Son-in-law” or a “covenant in law”)Submersed in (true) law. Dealing with Law itself. | “at Law” “Attorney at law”Can be at something but not submersed in it or a part of it. On the outside of law, not in it. | ||
| “Private” side | “Public” side | ||
| man, woman, child “one of the people” “a living soul” “flesh and blood” | “Person” defined as a corporation, trust, partnership,… “artificial legal entity” All fictions mirror-like identity recognizable in written form; usually in all caps The word “person” originated from the Latin word “persona” derived from Etruscan “phersu” which means “mask.” Is the STRAWMAN masquerading as the real man? | ||
| “Husband” “Wife” | “Spouse” Neither feminine nor masculine. A spouse is a “partnered trust” produced by marrying or merging two trust accounts. | ||
| “the people” mankind | “Persons“ various trusts, partnerships, corporations, or fictional entities of some kind. | ||
| “Sui Juris” Latin, of one’s own right One who has all the rights to which a freemen is entitled; one who is not under the power of another, as a slave, a minor, and the like. To make a valid contract, one must, in general, be sui juris. www.lectlaw.comAppearing on one’s own behalf– meaning you are not beholden to or obligated to anyone in or out of government.Referring to people who present themselves as a living soul in a flesh and blood body presenting the law and the facts. | “Pro se” Re-presents one’s self “in person” or “in persona” (mask) as a fiction. Serving as one’s own attorney. A privilege that can be taken away at anytime United States v Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1122“Pro per” short for “propria persona” meaning “proper person” Since “Person” is a fiction you are telling them you are in your proper person (mask) and not a man by any means.Keep in mind that pro per is better than pro se. Jurisdiction not admitted, if no attorney pleads. | ||
| Affirmation testify to the facts written testimony of the facts witness statement of the factsDeclaration To declare “…by these Presents””…being of sound mind, over the age of 21 years, competent, and having first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein, do hereby tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and herein say, saith, declare, proclaim, and claim as follows:…” | Affidavit (statutory venue) “An affidavit is an oath in writing, sworn before and attested by him [officer/notary] who hath authority to administer the same.” | ||
| Speak the Truth “My word is My Bond” Cannot swear or make an oath Matthew 5:33-37, James 5:12 | Oath an external pledge to swear or affirm usually under penalty of perjury | ||
| “I do not accept” “I take exception” to that | “I Object” “Objection, please” | ||
| Counsel or “Counsellor in-Law”Lawyer defined here as One who studies and understands the law or lawsNo license required No registration required No Bar card required Just need to know the Law. The Law is simple Do not Offend Anyone Honor all contracts And of course one has to recognize God’s Law some refer to as “Natures law” such as “gravity” or “breathe air to live.” Another basic choice one may live by is the Golden Rule “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” And others acknowledge and abide by the Ten Commandments These laws are simple easy to understand not hard to know and do not change There are no “codes” Almost anyone can become a Lawyer | Attorney an “Esquire” (British nobility) a title meaning “Shield Bearer”Attorney-at-law The defense Attorney, the Prosecutor, and the so-called Judge are all attorneys doing business in the corporate administrative courts (tribunals) of the U.S. as agents of the Crown of EnglandAttorneys swear an oath to uphold the “BAR ASSOCIATION”. The BAR ASSOCIATION is registered with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE as a 501(c)(3) organization like a religious tax exempt organization. Some people believe that the first letter of B.A.R.stands for “British”. (British Accredited Registry). This could be a myth, although the “bar” term may have originated in London having to do with an obstruction that denies or allows entrance such as “raising the bar” being a bridge or a gate. The BAR in the U.S. was first organized in Mississippi in 1825. The “integrated bar” movement, meaning “the condition precedent to the right to practice law,” was initiated in the US in 1914 by the American Jurisprudence Society. –Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition
“When only attorneys can understand the codes, statutes, and regulations (so-called laws), then only attorneys should be required to obey them.”–Jack; Slevkoff–2002
|
||
| The Supreme Court for The United States of America | the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT | ||
| The District Court for The United States of America were implemented for territories that were not states. | the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ||
| Lawyer or counsel for the states united | UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY | ||
| Prosecutor “In the early days of our Republic, ‘prosecutor’ was simply anyone who voluntarily went before the grand Jury with a complaint.”–United States v. Sandford, Fed. Case No.16, 221 (C.Ct.D.C. 1806) | PROSECUTOR A government official who conducts criminal prosecutions on behalf of the corporate STATE.An attorney who works for the LOCAL, STATE or FEDERAL government to bring and litigate so-called criminal cases.At the LOCAL level, the prosecutor will usually be the COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’s Office. In some cases the prosecutor may be from the CITY ATTORNEY’s Office. The PROSECUTOR reviews evidence to determine if a complaint may be filed. | ||
| Counsel to help the accused or the lawyer who knows and studies the law | Defense Attorney A so-called court can safely assume jurisdiction when one is re-presented by an attorney. | ||
| Must have damaged party | Compels performance No damaged party is necessary. | ||
| Maintains rights, freedoms, and liberties of the people | No rights except Civil Rights. and privileges that can be taken away at any time. Restricts freedoms and liberties. | ||
| Unalienable rights, fundamental rights, substantial rights and other rights of living souls are all protected by The Law and protected by The “organic” Constitution and its amendments. | US citizens are at the mercy of government and the administrative courts and tribunalsServants (subjects/ bond-servants) cannot sue the Master (Corporate government) unless allowed to. | ||
| The first ten articles of amendment to the constitution are sometimes refereed to as “Bill of Rights” which is incorrect. They are not a “Bill” but are simply “amendments.” | The actual “Bill of Rights” was a declaration in 1689 by King William and Queen Mary to their loyal subjects of the British crown. If you are in this jurisdiction, you are a subject of the crown as well? | ||
| Due Process is required | Due Process is optional–Sometimes Gestapo-like tactics without reservation. | ||
| Innocent until proven guilty“No Bill Of Attainder or Ex-post Facto Law, shall be passed.” –Constitution, in Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 3 | “Guilty“ until proven “not guilty“ (Especially, when faced with issues relating to the corporate government, its agents, and or its highwaymen.) The so-called judge will ask if one is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Always claim to be “innocent.” A “plea” enters one into a binding contract with the so-called court. | ||
| Jurors judge the law as well as the factsJurors are the last bastion of hope to free one from tyrannical or unjust laws imposed by government.Jury nullification “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of “not guilty” despite the common belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is immoral, unconstitutional or is wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate it is charged with deciding. Traditionally jurors are free to disregard the judge if they feel he is part of the system of oppression. Jury nullification is an essential protection for citizens against governmental tyranny.” –John Tiffany; AmericanFreePress.net | The judge instructs the jurors to try only the facts(not the code, statue, et cetera).The judge usually gives the statute, regulation, code, rule, etc. that will most likely convict the defendant. If there is any dispute with the so-called law, the judge will declare “I say what the law is”. If there is any more dispute with the law, the judge will say, “I will hold you in contempt if you continue in this manner.” Marcella Brooks testimony on video before the National Press Club on November 3, 2006 (14 min 24 sec) | ||
| Crime A crime is an offence against a public law. This word, in its most general signification, comprehends all offences but, in its limited sense, it is confined to felony. 1 Chitty, Gen. Pr. 14. 2. The term misdemeanor includes every offence inferior to felony, but punishable by indictment or by-particular prescribed proceedings. 3. The term offence, also, may be considered as, having the same meaning, but is usually, by itself, understood to be a crime not indictable but punishable, summarily, or by the forfeiture of, a penalty. Burn’s Just. Misdemeanor. 4. Crimes are defined and punished by statutes and by the common law. Most common lawoffences are as well known, and as precisely ascertained, as those which are defined by statutes; yet, from the difficulty of exactly defining and describing every act which ought to be punished, the vital and preserving principle has been adopted, that all immoral acts which tend to the prejudice of the community are punishable by courts of justice. 2 Swift’s Dig. All from Bouvier’s Law Dictionary | All crimes are considered Commercial crimes. “Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws;burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses);extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes.Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.”. 27 CFR Sec 72.11 (4-1-02 Edition)”Poor people have access to the courts in the same sense that the Christians had access to the lions.”- Judge Earl Johnson, Jr.”…there simply is too much law (government) to even function – we cannot get out of our own way, we have tied ourselves in knots – when we were supposed to have a limited government and the purpose of the Constitution was to tie government down to the EXPRESS powers given it. There simply is nothing left that government does not touch, have its hands on, and has not made a mess of. More law, more government will not save us – they are the problem.” –from an article written in 2006 by Attorney Gary Zerman, titled: “South Dakota Government Acted In Concert Against The People” Most courts have become the collection agency of the corporate government system for the debt created by said system to be paid in part by the people who come before the so-called court. | ||
| Lawful determination Judicial determination“The people’s one supreme Court is the county Court of record; the highest Court in the Land. Once it rules, the United States Supreme Courts, Federal or State, can not question the ruling; read the 7th amendment. The State and federal Courts are inferior tribunals to We the People’s one supreme Court. The one supreme Court exist wherever the People convene it! …the People have agreed to convene it at the county seat and the county judge is elect[ed] by the people as the administrator of their one supreme Court of Record. He makes no judicial ruling. He is only there to keep the Court open and see that it is run orderly and enforce the judgments of the Court of the People. When the jury is called and has been sworn from among the People they are the twelve justices sitting as the one supreme Court of Record for the People of that county.”Thomas Jefferson worried about that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law, an oligarchy, the rule of few over many. The very first Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, said, “Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers.” | Legal determination “THERE IS NO LAWYER OR JUDGE THAT CAN OR WILL GO AGAINST THIS COLORABLE SYSTEM!!” “Under this system, the judge makes “legal determinations” which is in accord with the creditors of this country. No Lawyer (Ly’Er) will demand a “JUDICIAL DETERMINATION”. Legal Determinations ARE NOT appealable as are Judicial Determinations!! Legal determinations are anything the judge says they are under their colorable Public policy laws. However, Judicial determinations are in accordance with the Public Law and are subject to CONstitutional constraints.””Since the Erie RR v. Tompkins decision in 1938, the courts have been operating under Public Policy, in the interest of the “nations creditors,” instead of Public Law in accord with the CONstitution.” “The judges are not allowed to consider any case law prior to 1938! BUT, there is one case,Clearfield Trust, et al v. US, 318 US 363 (1943),(see attachment). All courts are Administrative Tribunals, operating under a Colorable Admiralty Jurisdiction called Statutory Jurisdiction and all judges are Administrators, and all Lawyers (Pronounced Ly’Er) are officers of the colorable courts.” “The whole judiciary is administering the Bankruptcy of the US, declared by Roosevelt in 1933!!…” –2004 Billy-Joe..Mauldin | ||
| Everyone is responsible for their actions and words spoken.It does not matter what position or title one has in life. | The United States Supreme Court gave full immunity against both civil and criminal prosecution for perjury to Judges, Attorneys, Court Reporters, Stenographers, Law Enforcement Officers and Expert Witnesses, who testify for the STATE. See: A Brief on Judicial Immunity and Judicial Immunity vs Due ProcessThe deck is stacked against the ordinary people and even the innocent. | ||
| USA vs US | Part One | ||
| USA vs US Links | Part Two – Multiple links | ||
| The Commerce Game LINK 1 | LINK 2 | Hidden basics | ||
| Parens Patriae | Some more interesting information to be aware of. | ||
| CAFR – Part 1 | How government systematically hides money | ||
| CAFR – Part 2 | More on secret money hidden away at all levels of government. | ||
| Secret Laws | Some legal information you may not be aware of. | ||
| The Corporation LINK 1 | LINK 2 | An etymology of the word “corporation.” |
